Raw Food Diet — A Raw Deal?

An article entitled “Raw Food Diet — A Raw Deal” was posted at LiveScience by Christopher Wanjek. Well It seems to me that the diet has had the raw deal and as this site is influential I wanted to address some of the points raised.

He starts of with a mocking tone which immediately irritated me and then goes on to refer to the diet as ‘whacked’ but to the article…

Firstly he objects to raw food diet proponents claiming it to be a “natural diet.” I quote…

“But ‘natural’ is always a dangerous word. Humans have evolved to eat and survive on a wide range of diets. The Inuit have survived thousands of years almost entirely on a diet of raw fish and meat. Some cultures, conveniently in regions of prolonged growing seasons, shun all meat as unnatural.”

A natural diet is one that contains primarily food eaten in an unprepared way. i.e. directly from nature. Therefore that would mean raw where possible. It is true that if you believe the scientists, as humans expanded across the globe, those foods available in their current locale would vary, and would agree that minor “adaptions” have occurred within races due to this fact.

“Evolved” is too strong a word here I feel. As far as the Innuit are concerned, their diet would still fall into the natural diet genre. I take his point that natural diets are very varied though and not all vegan and that point is valid. Some cultures shunning meat during prolonged growing seasons? What’s his point here?

Christopher points out that commercial meat and fish products are “loaded with bacteria” and therefore must be cooked. How would this affect the previously mocked raw vegans? I don’t see anyone recommending the consumption of raw commercial meat anyway. There are some groups that advocate raw animal foods, but not commercial stuff.

Anyway, most average Joes would be horrified at the thought of raw meat. However, most of the bacteria present is due to the industry and methods. The innuit as he previously pointed out don’t seem to be bothered about cooking their meat and eat raw… as did our pre-agricultural ancestors for that matter. Chimps don’t seem to have a problem eating raw colobus monkeys either.

He goes on to question why the raw diet folk need to supplement B12 and zinc and says these are not available in a raw diet. Again I’m confused, which raw diet are you talking about? Why raise the meat issue if we are discussing raw vegans?

The B12 issue as with the meat issue is mainly a problem of our food industry and separation from a natural setting. Dirt is everywhere in nature and as you eat the food you eat the dirt along with any bugs that are on it! B12 is produced by naturally occurring bacteria on raw food. However I’m not an advocate of raw veganism as such as I see no natural model for it that I’m aware of, so he does have a point here.

Interestingly, last night I came across the The Maker’s Diet (‘The 40 Day Health Experience That Will Change Your Life Forever’) and on first glance looks remarkably like The Zone Diet and Age Power evolutionary approaches. The point here is that he recommends taking “Soil Based Organisms” and of course some people are up in arms.

But if we look at a natural model and compare our lifestyle we can easily see that we are missing some dirt! As biology and nature are exquisitely balanced, it seems reasonable especially considering the B12 issue that we should add it back it.

Incidentally, the reason yogurt is raved about is for very similar organisms that are in the dirt we are missing.

His final attack on “raw diets” although we are still not sure which ones he means, comes in the form of a statement that cooking “improves the absorption of carotenoids and other nutrients.” This statement is not backed up either by reason or science but there has been research showing increased levels of certain nutrients when cooked.

My understanding is that cooking breaks down cellulose within vegetables and this allows the body to absorb nutrients that otherwise would be locked behind cellulose walls. So what? Cooking also destoys many other nutrients… let’s keep it simple and stick to a natural model.

As far as Christopher’s claim that we are adapted to cooked foods due to the snacking of roasted grasshoppers in bush fires… I resist the urge to mock — no comment!

Looking for a happier, healthier way of life?

I've been passionate about what makes us happy and healthy for over 20 years now. It's all laid out for you in a simple step-by-step guide...

 
to get Habit Guide in FREE weekly emails...

 
Privacy Policy: We'll never share your details with
anyone and you'll be free to unsubscribe at any time.
 

Mike Kinnaird
Habit Guide: How to be Happy & Healthy

 

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required - will not be displayed)

Comments

  1. tofu

    No one has the right to criticize a diet until they actually try it and test it on themselves for at least a 2-4 week period to give it a fair chance. Beware of theorists!

  2. Excellent point although raw vegan diets are notoriously difficult in terms of transition so 4 weeks would certainly not be enough.

    Karen from The Fresh Network has looked at this incidently for those interested and has tried to simplify the whole process.

    Raw vegan is amazing for overcoming health conditions… long term, I’m concerned.

  3. digger

    I made the switch 18 months ago to a raw food diet. Do to medical conditions and family history. I was heading in the wrong direction eating the American diet. I am now off all meds and feel great. Can’t beat that as far as I’m concerned.

    digger

  4. aubrey

    I like your point about the dirt..I don’t really understand why people wash their ORGANIC produce so religiously. Personally, I find it a waste of time (and b12).

    The whole cellulose thing gets me every time. Has anyone heard of a blender here…? Yay for lycopene and beta-carotene! I get it. Just go eat a watermelon and juice your carrots, hello.

    About the article…
    The irony is particularly stinging when he mentions the (raw) Inuit. No, he does not mention they are raw, or their former health glories before they “went cooked.” *sigh*

    I’ve heard that the pancreas of SAD / cooked vegans vs. raw vegans is always enlarged due to lack of food enzymes (I’d guess lipase in particular). Does anyone know of any facts to back this up? We’ve all experienced the lethargy of cooked, but I’d like to know about this pancreas deal.

    “…this was promoted in the United States by Aveline Kushi, who died of cancer.

    The macrobiotic people got it right, though.”

    Okay, if that one gets by his readers… god help them.

  5. Hi Aubrey,

    I’ve seen many incorrect references to the Inuit — like you say, the confusion coming from mixing up the current state of affairs with when they lived in and from nature.

    I saw a documentary on the Inuit only recently and wow, their lives were hard, really really hard. Yet, the daily battles with nature made them fit, strong, resilient and gave them a very strong sense of purpose. Now they buy refined carbs from the store, order pizzas and watch TV.

    Humanity has to find the middle ground where we use our skills to make sure daily life isn’t life or death but that we still live in harmony with the natural world. Dream on eh?

    The pancreas thing is a new one on me… let me know if you find anything out on that one :-)

 

 

Affiliates | Health Articles | Legal
Copyright © Passion for Health 2007-2010. All rights reserved.